Search for: All records

Proper enhancer–promoter interactions are essential to maintaining specific transcriptional patterns and preventing ectopic gene expression. Drosophila is an ideal model organism to study transcriptional regulation due to extensively characterized regulatory regions and the ease of implementing new genetic and molecular techniques for quantitative analysis. The mechanisms of enhancer–promoter interactions have been investigated over a range of length scales. At a DNA level, compositions of both enhancer and promoter sequences affect transcriptional dynamics, including duration, amplitude, and frequency of transcriptional bursting. 3D chromatin topology is also important for proper enhancer–promoter contacts. By working competitively or cooperatively with one another, multiple, simultaneous enhancer–enhancer, enhancer–promoter, and promoter–promoter interactions often occur to maintain appropriate levels of mRNAs. For some long-range enhancer–promoter interactions, extra regulatory elements like insulators and tethering elements are required to promote proper interactions while blocking aberrant ones. This review provides an overview of our current understanding of the mechanism of enhancer–promoter interactions and how perturbations of such interactions affect transcription and subsequent physiological outcomes. 

The mechanism by which transcriptional machinery is recruited to enhancers and promoters to regulate gene expression is one of the most challenging and extensively studied questions in modern biology. We explored the possibility that interallelic interactions between two homologous alleles might affect gene regulation. Using an MS2- and PP7-based, allele-specific live imaging assay, we visualized de novo transcripts of a reporter gene in hemizygous and homozygous Drosophila embryos. Surprisingly, each homozygous allele produced fewer RNAs than the corresponding hemizygous allele, suggesting the possibility of allelic competition in homozygotes. However, the competition was not observed when the enhancer-promoter interaction was weakened by placing the reporter construct in a different chromosome location or by moving the enhancer further away from the promoter. Moreover, the reporter gene showed reduced transcriptional activity when a partial transcription unit (either an enhancer or reporter gene only) was in the homologous position. We propose that the transcriptional machinery that binds both the enhancer and promoter regions, such as RNA Pol II or preinitiation complexes, may be responsible for the allelic competition. We showed that the degree of allelic interference increased over developmental time as more Pol II was needed to activate zygotic genes. Such allelic competition was observed for an endogenous gene as well. Our study provides new insights into the role of 3D interallelic interactions in gene regulation.